Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-866

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-866  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-866
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 06:26
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$97
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 88.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 512
68% 509 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Sapphire(174B 326C) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9
Parallax 8.2
6% 8 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 151 143 135 139 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 895
Mixed 929
SusWrite 151
180% 810 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 56.6
208% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 242
183% 246 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 135%
Great: 169%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
919GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 199 200 198 198 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 185
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 199
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 113%
Great: 107%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 7.2 4.2 6.7 10 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Read 16
Write 5.7
Mixed 16
SusWrite 5.8
14% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
50% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 8%
USB Flash DISK 16GB
14GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 22 23 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 89.2
Write 65.8
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 25.4
72% 58 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
127% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 1.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-866 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-866

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback