Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 22:18
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 199
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 334
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 102 51 57 60 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 347
Write 186
Mixed 201
SusWrite 75.8
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 13.8
43% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 81.4
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 41.3
37% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 55%
WD WDS240G2G0A-00JH30 1TB
188GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 207 207 207 207 207 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 195
Write 150
Mixed 85
SusWrite 205
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 DDR4 3000 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback