Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3430 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 127 60% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 254 34% 254 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3870 554 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E620) 512MB Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.21% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 11.3 Parallax 2.5 6% 7.2 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 9.6 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.21% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB 8,028 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 48 63 66 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 62.3 Write 52.3 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 55.9 35% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 52%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB 8,392 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 131GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 108 109 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 110 Write 101 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 108 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 12 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 6.6 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM