Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220725
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 20:10
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 85.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 784
76% 622 Pts
64-Core 1,188
74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.40
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 104
Parallax 96.6
79% 99.1 fps
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 8.1
40% 51.6 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 133 75 77 84 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.1% Below average
Read 180
Write 103
Mixed 85
SusWrite 140
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 10.7
49% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 100%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
184GB free
Firmware: SS0328D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 470 478 476 476 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,512
Write 1836
Mixed 240
SusWrite 539
282% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 74
245% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 383
397% 649 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 245%
Great: 311%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 275 275 275 275 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 304
Mixed 348
SusWrite 295
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 49.9
170% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 235
215% 328 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
388GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 48.2
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 50.3
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 63%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
729GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 79.8
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 58.5
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 55%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 38.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 37.3
47% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
94% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 33.4
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 29.3
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback