Asus MAXIMUS VII GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII GENE  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '17 at 10:37
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 264
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 717
73% 592 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 120
Parallax 104
98% 115 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 104
Splatting 105
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
111GB free
Firmware: 603A
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 380
Write 134
Mixed 198
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 17.5
105% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 90.1
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 33.4
47% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 73%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$49
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 512
Write 338
Mixed 321
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 29.2
129% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 35.3
49% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST6000VN0041-2EL11C 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC61 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 140
Write 141
Mixed 67.1
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.22
93% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
871GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 144
Mixed 97.6
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.35
100% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$23
297GB free
Firmware: SN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 86
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.45
136% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 103%
SONY WALKMAN 128GB
73GB free, PID 0bbf, Sandisk Ultra 128G microSD
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 26.1
Write 29.4
Mixed 34
40% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.87
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 3.85
463% 7.47 MB/s
DQ Read 8.93
DQ Write 8.64
DQ Mixed 2.88
425% 6.82 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%
SONY WALKMAN 13GB
12GB free, PID 0bbf, Sony Walkman A-35
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 38
Write 30.6
Mixed 32.7
42% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 4.17
553% 8.94 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 4.92
569% 8.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMD16GX3M2A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0215 CMD16GX3M2A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII GENE Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII GENE - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $881
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback