Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 23:08
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 611
60% 492 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4838 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 141
Parallax 140
116% 141 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 142
Splatting 134
114% 139 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 112%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 512GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 425 394 370 414 369 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 452
Mixed 409
SusWrite 401
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 38.5
130% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 336
258% 350 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 109%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
22GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 456
Mixed 370
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 40.1
138% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 201
189% 294 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 80 84 82 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 75.6
Write 68.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 81.7
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$50
3TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 199 197 197 200 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 123
Mixed 84
SusWrite 197
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 37.7
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback