Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M S2H  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 22:55
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 223
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 666
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 920
57% 920 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 89.1
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 3.6
73% 44.8 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 84.2
Splatting 77
70% 86.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1173 519 518 528 534 523 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,036
Write 972
Mixed 1,074
SusWrite 632
209% 929 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 58.8
198% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,140
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 898
686% 937 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 184%
Great: 300%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
233GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 478 424 342 344 344 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 451
Mixed 408
SusWrite 394
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 42.3
147% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 347
261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
OCZ VERTEX PLUS 120GB
17GB free
Firmware: 3.50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 158 158 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 145
Write 165
Mixed 100
SusWrite 158
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 10.2
52% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 45.7
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 11.2
14% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 217 214 218 217 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H410M S2H Builds (Compare 2,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback