Today's hottest deals

HP ENVY TE01-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ENVY TE01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220302
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 22:08
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$359
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 960
91% 753 Pts
64-Core 1329
82% 1329 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8767) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 14.1
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
647GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1303 516 535 492 488 485 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1380
Write 1,721
Mixed 1311
SusWrite 636
284% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 46.5
153% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 360
276% 385 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 159%
Great: 300%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
315GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 157 156 154 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 151
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 156
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
357% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 110%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 50.4
Write 36.7
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 36.4
51% 39 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 9.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 60 27" 1280 720 HPN3579 HP 27m
Typical ENVY TE01-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TE01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $359
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback