Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 30 '22 at 12:27
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 226
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 444
60% 445 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 90.6
52% 72.3 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 47
48% 60.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 2.9 73 15 80 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 307
Write 102
Mixed 146
SusWrite 58.9
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 22.2
104% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 137
129% 197 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
762GB free
Firmware: AX1P2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 106 103 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 100
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 105
60% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.9
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback