Acer Aspire A315-53

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Metapod_KL
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 19:05
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 208
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 567
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1295) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+447G 480GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 158 162 145 289 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Samsung 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-53 Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback