Acer Swift SF315-52G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SF315-52G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Erdinger_KL
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 16:49
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 173
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 254
27% 214 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1273) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+447G 480GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 126 121 295 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 601
Write 126
Mixed 207
SusWrite 152
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 40.5
141% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 251
181% 240 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 859B CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 18.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0700
Typical Swift SF315-52G Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF315-52G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback