Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 23.3 1-Core 72 2-Core 134 39% 76.5 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 386 38% 309 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% AMD(1002 0123) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.14% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 7.2 4% 5.93 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 4.14% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Casper-256GB 256GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0609B0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 503 178 318 312 360 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 1224 Write 695 Mixed 636 SusWrite 368 162% 730 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 11.8 74% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 66.6 85% 161 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 54GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 142 Write 84.2 Mixed 96.5 128% 108 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3.1 191% 3 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Samsung 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 9 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 297 14% 297 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	497x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	486x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	468x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,381x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	495x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	357x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87