QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 08:39
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 33.7
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 108
32% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 344
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 140GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 743
Write 477
Mixed 550
131% 590 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 11.4
48% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 102
88% 131 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 86%
Red Hat VirtIO 34GB
31GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 352 362 311 317 352 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 606
Write 420
Mixed 462
SusWrite 347
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 10.4
43% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 152
112% 147 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 65%
Red Hat VirtIO 183GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 110 107 102 177 329 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 34% Great: 57%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
40GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 111 106 103 183 362 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
95GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 114 102 104 184 358 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
95GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 114 106 106 192 363 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB
33GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 280 257 220 192 146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 51.4
MC Mixed 44.9
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.1
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback