Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory13.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.4 GB free of 13.6719 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 03 '19 at 07:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 152
56% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 282
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 193GB
155GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.63% Terrible
Read 104
Write 30.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 13.8
9% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 79%
Red Hat VirtIO 183GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 14 12 14 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.2% Below average
Read 107
Write 28.7
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 12.6
35% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 7.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback