Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	13.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	11.4 GB free of 13.6719 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '19 at 07:04
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Common KVM processor 2,228 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 152 56% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 282 38% 285 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 98%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 193GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 155GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	5.63% Terrible	Read 104 Write 30.7 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 13.8 9% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 2% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 5.63% Great: 79%
Red Hat VirtIO 183GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 14 12 14 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.2% Below average	Read 107 Write 28.7 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 12.6 35% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x13GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1 of 1 slots used 13GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.6% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 11.1 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 7.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350