QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory13.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.7 GB free of 13.6719 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 15:09
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 11 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 295
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,122
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 1,971
122% 1,971 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 3426) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 139
Parallax 120
111% 132 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 133
Splatting 103
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 277GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1081 1071 922 751 794 824 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Toshiba P300 3TB-$106
543GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 131 136 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 122
Write 133
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 136
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
867GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 382 378 380 383 382 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 101%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 996GB
783GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 70 69 66 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 70.6
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 68.6
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.7 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 69.7
Write 5
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 5.8
21% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1
74% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 36.3
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 36.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback