Today's hottest deals

Hetzner vServer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHetzner vServer  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.1 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 34.6
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 114
38% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 626
47% 422 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 246GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 360 361 355 351 351 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
184% Outstanding
MC Read 77.9
MC Write 60.5
MC Mixed 93.5
221% 77.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 23.6
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 184%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback