Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory11.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.7 GB free of 11.9355 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 16:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 43.7
1-Core 44
2-Core 69.4
32% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 247
27% 213 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$254
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.88
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 80.9
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 90.2
66% 82.3 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 81.8
79% 98.3 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 140GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 172 523 527 455 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 421
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 348
50% 216 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.1
4% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback