Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.3GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.9 GB free of 8.30078 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 07:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 205
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 507
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P40-3Q
Nvidia(10DE 11EA) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 443.05
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 61.9
50% 61.9 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 61.8
51% 61.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 322GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 844 946 963 940 935 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.2% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 18.9
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 14.7
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback