Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime12 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 15:07
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 491
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 9.1
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 216 158 165 162 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 919
Mixed 1,020
SusWrite 218
199% 895 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 62
255% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 550
454% 649 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 179%
Great: 166%
Generic SD/MMC/MS/xD 32GB
30GB free, PID 6465
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 5.1 4.5 4.8 5.2 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 10
Write 4.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.6
8% 6.28 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
51% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 8%
Generic MicroSD/M2 32GB
18GB free, PID 6465
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 7.5
Mixed 15
SusWrite 0.6
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.4
151% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_A512JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback