Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 05:34
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 74
2-Core 98.7
48% 78 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 147
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 4.2
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 5.3
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 177 183 181 185 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 705
Write 386
Mixed 368
SusWrite 186
91% 411 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 19.1
66% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 225
174% 239 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback