Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200203
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 01:11
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 210
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 413
46% 361 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Asus(1043 1B2F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 11.2
10% 12.4 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 10
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 528 415 420 417 424 428 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,102
Write 1,045
Mixed 1,039
SusWrite 439
203% 906 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 60.3
213% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 700
535% 726 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 170%
Great: 179%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
923GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 114 114 115 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 106
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 112
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback