HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170518
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 176
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 535
52% 426 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 19.7
16% 19 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 0.3
11% 15.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Tech 256GB
174GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 340 320 299 331 320 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 316
Write 315
Mixed 296
SusWrite 324
71% 313 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 23.9
80% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 156
118% 158 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST300MM0048 300GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 135 137 98 54 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 108
Write 120
Mixed 94
SusWrite 111
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.8
399% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 111%
Toshiba MQ01ACF0 320GB
222GB free
Firmware: 1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 125 119 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 124
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS725032A7 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: A500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 106 104 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 89.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 108
58% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HUC101830CSS204 300GB
167GB free
Firmware: HPH0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 184 183 183 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 200
Mixed 104
SusWrite 184
126% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.7
307% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
337GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 56 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 47.4
Write 56.2
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 55.1
69% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 42%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB
69GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 36 39 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 33.4
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 38
44% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CPB HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 23.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 21
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback