Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151208
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 186
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 495
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1081) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 9
Parallax 9.3
7% 8.83 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST300MM0006 300GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 125 142 150 146 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 124
Write 132
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 140
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.3
269% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST300MM0048 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: N001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 199 196 198 195 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 194
Mixed 104
SusWrite 197
126% 171 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
412% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
197GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 62.5
Write 39.2
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 39.1
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST300MM0048 300GB
277GB free
Firmware: N001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 188 189 188 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 189
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 189
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
433% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5173EB0- Hynix HMT451U7DFR8A M391B5173EB0- Hynix HMT451U7DFR8A 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback