Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 198 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 481 53% 419 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.4% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 10.3 7% 9.83 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 9.6 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.4% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUC101830CSS204 300GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 192 192 194 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 200 Mixed 105 SusWrite 193 127% 174 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 261% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 112%
Hitachi HUC101830CSS204 300GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 279GB free Firmware: HPH0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 208 210 210 209 209 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 212 Mixed 106 SusWrite 209 134% 183 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.7 311% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 112%
Seagate ST300MM0006 300GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 279GB free Firmware: HPS1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 189 189 189 189 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 179 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 188 119% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.7 327% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U7BFR8C-RD Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1G9P1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1G9P1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1G9P1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1G9P1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1G9P1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1G9P1 HMT451U7BFR8C-RD 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 31.4 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 12.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	500x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	309x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	264x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	57x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373