PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Bh |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110714 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 04 '22 at 05:35 |
Run Duration | 321 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon HD 7350
HP(103C 2127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
1.1%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22
806GB free (System drive)
Firmware:
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 90 95 90 86 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
56.8%
Above average
|
||||
WD WD2503ABYZ-011FA0 251GB
171GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 66 66 72 73 MB/s
|
49.6%
Average
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
836GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.7 8.4 8.1 7.8 8.1 MB/s
|
9.6%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
6GB free, PID 0202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.9 8.5 8.2 7.9 8 MB/s
|
9.64%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
21GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.7 8.4 8 7.9 8 MB/s
|
7.05%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Elements 500GB
4GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.7 8.2 8.1 7.7 8 MB/s
|
9.28%
Terrible
|
|||
WD My Passport Essential 750GB
113GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 7.5 8 7.8 7.6 7.7 MB/s
|
7.91%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
94GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.8 8.4 8.1 8 8 MB/s
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
12GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.9 4.5 5 4 3.3 MB/s
|
7.34%
Terrible
|
|||
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13
30GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.1 3.6 0.2 4.1 5.1 MB/s
|
4.86%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Ultra Slim MT 2TB
1TB free, PID ab2d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 9.5 10 9.5 9.1 9.6 MB/s
|
6.23%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
3TB free, PID ac25
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.1 4.8 5.6 4.2 4.6 MB/s
|
7.92%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
34.5%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 198x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 159x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 53x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 41x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 33x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 18x |
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |