Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 06:45
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6098P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 185
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 234
35% 256 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 80 112 101 125 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 365
Write 312
Mixed 280
SusWrite 124
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 8.5
56% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 14.2
34% 71 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
85GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 40.1
Write 37.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 39.6
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23%
Great: 63%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
324GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 40.4
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 38.9
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 500GB
299GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 99 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 85.4
Write 88.6
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 99.5
111% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
352GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 38
Write 40
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 39.5
48% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 22.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback