Performance Results

Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 101%
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 07:20
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$220
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 347
107% 202 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 1,131
104% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,638
101% 1,638 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$234
Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 92.6
Parallax 110
88% 104 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 105
Splatting 87
86% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8480G 480GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 169 267 165 142 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 329
Write 109
Mixed 227
SusWrite 183
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 32
118% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 12.1
79% 181 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 101%
997GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 169 172 170 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 178
Write 170
Mixed 121
SusWrite 171
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 1.1
61% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 39%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
504GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 165
Write 107
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 106
139% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 31.2
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 29.3
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $473
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback