Today's hottest deals

Gateway DX4300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGateway DX4300  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway RS780
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090820
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 21 '15 at 13:31
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 805
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 83.8
29% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 169
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 42% Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Acer(1025 0155) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.39% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.39%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 66
Write 84.9
Mixed 58.9
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.22
72% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 57%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 750GB
297GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 77
Write 68.8
Mixed 70.7
92% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 35%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
209GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 107
137% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.25
64% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 72%
WD My Passport Essential 750GB
63GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 18.9
Mixed 28.4
31% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 18%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 7.85
Mixed 10.5
13% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.07
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.01
16% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 15%
Typical DX4300 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway DX4300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback