Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20151229
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 13:47
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 118
56% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 184
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 48.5
31% 39.6 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 22.2
23% 29.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 60GB
55GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 53 59 61 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 46.2
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 61.7
14% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 21
62% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 77.1
64% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
780GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 34 27 35 44 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 180
Write 144
Mixed 66
SusWrite 38.7
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
465GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 37 32 38 47 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 55
Write 50
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 41.4
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 121 63 101 166 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 154
Write 170
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 131
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3200827AS 200GB-$128
186GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 52 54 55 60 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 61
Write 34.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 56.3
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Toshiba StorE HDD 160GB
134GB free, PID 0b15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 22 21 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 22
13% 8.77 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 16.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback