Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 16:51
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$84
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 95
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 141
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 357
37% 298 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 31.9
19% 28 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 20
20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 14 22 27 26 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 92.3
Write 86.3
Mixed 55
SusWrite 24.4
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
274GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.3 6.6 7.1 7 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 30
Write 6
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 6.6
10% 13 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback