Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 14:49
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500-$200
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 269
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 854
84% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.3
4% 7.57 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.4
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 279 218 213 216 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 613
Write 564
Mixed 551
SusWrite 262
112% 498 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.9
186% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 876
630% 812 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 133%
Great: 237%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
265GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 224 250 243 128 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.8% Below average
Read 226
Write 106
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 180
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 9.8
47% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 102%
TANDBERG RDX 500GB
187GB free, PID 0005
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 58 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 57.1
Write 57.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 57.3
68% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 44%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
4GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 6.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 5
10% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.8
94% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-094.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback