Today's hottest deals

Asus X556URK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X556URK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556URK
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 17:30
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 288
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
Asus(1043 1490) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9709
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 11
9% 10.1 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07181
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 404 391 191 205 342 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 418
Mixed 386
SusWrite 318
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46.6
177% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 303
218% 279 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 8GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 21
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X556URK Builds (Compare 577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556URK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback