PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B365M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191010 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 21 '22 at 23:43 |
Run Duration | 239 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 638 1138 558 320 245 247 MB/s
|
136%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
213GB free
Firmware: AM0P2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 82 87 88 88 MB/s
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5702-094.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,736x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $83Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 505x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $130Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 435x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $219Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 385x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 371x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $267Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 288x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $396 |