HP 810-370st

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 810-370st  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACE
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 01:02
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 81%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 99
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 584
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 121
Parallax 109
89% 113 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 107
Splatting 108
86% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
617GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 802 375 347 504 410 376 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 160 160 159 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 115
Write 144
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 159
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
118% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
1TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 179 180 181 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 119
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 179
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 33
Write 28.5
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 19.1
20% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 97%
SDHC Card 8GB
7GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 18.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 15.3
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
65% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C1 CT102464BD160B.C1 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 35.8
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-370st Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 810-370st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback