Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING  (all builds)
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 00:24
Run Duration405 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$232
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 172
2-Core 338
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,284
116% 974 Pts
64-Core 2,347
145% 2,347 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
PNY(196E 1338) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.39
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 161
Reflection 152
Parallax 152
131% 155 fps
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
111% 127 fps
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1943 2087 1959 2114 1945 1920 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 2,332
Mixed 2,198
SusWrite 1,994
503% 2,231 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 86.2
276% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 960
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 734
571% 790 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 341%
Great: 508%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
192GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 478 471 472 471 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 453
Mixed 456
SusWrite 468
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 55.1
181% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
321GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2916 2991 2915 1585 1208 1215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,436
Write 3059
Mixed 2,644
SusWrite 2,138
581% 2,569 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 85.8
271% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 677
DQ Mixed 748
578% 796 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 349%
Great: 477%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
533GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 284 217 322 313 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 300
Write 160
Mixed 295
SusWrite 278
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 19.1
69% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 186
135% 180 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58%
Great: 96%
WD Game Drive 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 97 101 99 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 87.9
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 97
119% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
216% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 66%
ProGrade SD PG08 128GB
109GB free, PID a012
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 72 76 81 77 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 84.1
Write 74.9
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 68.6
95% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.9
167% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 96%
WD easystore 264D 12TB
4.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 148 148 145 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 120
SusWrite 146
188% 137 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 1
332% 4.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 6.6
DQ Mixed 1.2
268% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 24.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING Builds (Compare 6,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $726
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback