MSI MS-17E9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 10SFS
MotherboardMSI MS-17E9  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, , , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 21:13
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 228
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 736
68% 568 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile)
MSI(1462 12BC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.8% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 117
Parallax 108
84% 109 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 98
Splatting 92.7
89% 112 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1326 1238 1185 1164 1149 1065 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,123
Write 1,659
Mixed 1,385
SusWrite 1,188
355% 1,589 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 53.3
172% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 464
367% 523 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 236%
Great: 372%
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1032 512GB
375GB free
Firmware: 11110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 343 341 344 339 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,824
Write 924
Mixed 1,161
SusWrite 422
240% 1083 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 18.7
90% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 227
263% 470 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 151%
Great: 264%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 129 124 127 126 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 77.2
Write 106
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 125
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 36
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 22.1
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1
226% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 104%
WD easystore 264D 12TB
614GB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 35.1
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 19.4
43% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.4
178% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX32GX4M1A2666C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.4
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 21.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E9 Builds (Compare 1,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback