Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130719
Uptime23 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 05:54
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 191
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 271
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
HP(103C 094E) 512MB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 353.62
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
519GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 421 423 415 420 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 440
Mixed 416
SusWrite 415
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 55.4
173% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB
297GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 317 323 308 315 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 335
Write 349
Mixed 262
SusWrite 313
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 28.2
91% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 136
104% 141 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 36 53 26 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 123
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 39.4
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
244GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 71 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 169
Write 178
Mixed 109
SusWrite 71
172% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 96%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.6
7% 6.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 7%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 37.3
Write 34.1
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 36.3
47% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
220% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 59%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
195GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 72 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 217
Write 163
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 72.4
168% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 95%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB
204GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 69 68 70 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.5% Above average
Read 225
Write 122
Mixed 62
SusWrite 69.8
139% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
71% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB
296GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 71 70 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
Read 209
Write 188
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 70.3
168% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10242281 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $40

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback