Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110520
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 07:23
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 148
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 395
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Device(0000 0000) 1.2GB
Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 311.6
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 8.94
14% 18.7 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 21.9
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$81
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 203 252 240 230 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 386
Mixed 340
SusWrite 227
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 52.6
146% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
192GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 70 87 84 86 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 188
Write 187
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 80
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
540GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 61 70 70 72 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 84.3
Write 82
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 67.5
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
438GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 75 85 88 89 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 99
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 83.2
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
172GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 70 87 84 85 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69% Good
Read 160
Write 152
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 79.9
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69%
Great: 108%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
187GB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 55 74 63 68 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 94.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 63.9
70% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
46% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 95%
StoreJet Transcend 3TB
14GB free, PID 5106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 39 46 43 43 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 91.8
Write 81.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 42.6
81% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3R Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback