Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory11.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 07:58
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 234
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 622
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 69.2
58% 72 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$118
65GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 200 169 143 141 201 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 437
Write 401
Mixed 295
SusWrite 180
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 39.5
145% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 41.6
79% 164 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$46
273GB free
Firmware: MX4OABX0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 119 120 120 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 118
Write 106
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 119
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 108%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 172 175 173 178 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 99%
Amd-raid WDS100T3X0C-00SJ 1TB
559GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 42 40 44 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 353%
Generic- SD/MMC 256GB
222GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 30.8
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 36
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.7
239% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23%
Great: 23%
SMI USB DISK 64GB
58GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 24 31 29 31 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 120
Write 35.6
Mixed 25
SusWrite 29.1
56% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 3.2
174% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 40%
WD Elements 1TB
808GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 35
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 21.3
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 2TB
497GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 33.3
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 20.8
39% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 128 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 99.5
Write 97.4
Mixed 76
SusWrite 127
137% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
3TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 140 142 140 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 125
Write 129
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 140
166% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 04CD000080AD F4-2133C15-8GRR 04CD000080AD F4-2133C15-8GRR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 23.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback