Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 02:51
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 214
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 590
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.3% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 65.3
54% 67.9 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 65.5
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$98
544GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,832
Write 1837
Mixed 1,627
394% 1,765 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 51.9
165% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 425
DQ Mixed 591
424% 549 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$118
98GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 430
Write 418
Mixed 302
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 27.8
102% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 69.5
131% 260 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$46
988GB free
Firmware: MX4OABX0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 176
Write 182
Mixed 37.9
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 127
Mixed 104
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
305% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 99%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
115GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 65.6
Mixed 55.7
93% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.9
141% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 45%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 108
Mixed 85.5
131% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 68%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
3TB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 140
Mixed 106
160% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
WD Elements 2TB
484GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.4
Write 34.7
Mixed 28.8
42% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
WD Elements 1TB
102GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.1
Write 26.9
Mixed 27.2
36% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 04CD000080AD F4-2133C15-8GRR 04CD000080AD F4-2133C15-8GRR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 16
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback