Lenovo 80VK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80VK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 7C1
Memory11.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170517
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 02:40
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 152
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 217
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 39E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 54 62 72 81 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 47
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 70.3
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
0GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 216
Write 181
Mixed 62.4
178% 153 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 6.3
612% 8.2 MB/s
DQ Read 8.8
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 10.4
808% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 111%
JetFlash Transcend 128GB
47GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 11.4
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 0.9
18% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3.9
279% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 63%
Corsair Voyager 8GB
7GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.35% Terrible
Read 30.2
Write 13.2
Mixed 11
SusWrite 12.9
20% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80VK Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80VK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback