Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DA
Memory12.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 131
44% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 415
39% 324 Pts
64-Core 49.4
3% 49.4 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1831) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.16.06
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 3.8
2% 6.13 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 12.5
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1102 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 250 199 210 199 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 326
Write 295
Mixed 281
SusWrite 219
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 29.7
95% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 461
326% 414 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback