Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20NF0006FR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20NF0006FR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NF0006FR
Memory15.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220126
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 13:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 202
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 478
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.40.06
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.61% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 16.7
10% 13.1 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 11.1
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.61%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EL1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 70 69 68 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 1,049
Write 107
Mixed 165
SusWrite 69
74% 347 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 29.6
131% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 89.1
DQ Mixed 131
107% 157 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 177%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
124GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 33 32 32 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 32.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 32.1
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 21.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20NF0006FR Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20NF0006FR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback