Asus P7P55 WS SUPERCOMPUTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55 WS SUPERCOMPUTER  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 12:19
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 661-$80
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 133
55% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 210
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800
Nvidia(10DE 0593) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 342.00
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
8.32% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 5.8
10% 9.93 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 3.8
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.32%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 126 123 123 126 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 232
Write 192
Mixed 110
SusWrite 134
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 9.7
43% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 13.7
28% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
348GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 56 55 54 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 52.7
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 54.5
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
9GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 18 17 24 23 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 20.1
Write 22.1
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 20.6
29% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 4.3
308% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55 WS SUPERCOMPUTER Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7P55 WS SUPERCOMPUTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback