Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results

Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 46%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive18.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E LX  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 17:31
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 661-$80
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 111
45% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 127
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5830
Sapphire(174B E140) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 15.9
13% 15.1 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 9.6
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 48 42 23 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.7% Very poor
Read 137
Write 94
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 32.9
19% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 9.4
33% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 18.9
14% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
291GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 52 43 23 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 122
Write 95.3
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 36
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 22%
Desktop 71%
Workstation 17%

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback