Medion Akoya P5333 H/B548

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion Akoya P5333 H/B548 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 15:31
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 187 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 365 50% 369 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3203) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 38.4 32% 40.3 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 33.3 29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB 1,148 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT0101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 129 130 131 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60% Good	Read 479 Write 132 Mixed 167 SusWrite 128 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 22.9 93% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 41.4 DQ Mixed 57.9 56% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 754GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 145 145 146 147 145 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 157 Write 125 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 143 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 114%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 34.3 Write 28.1 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 23.6 37% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 44%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 11GB free, PID 711f Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 65 66 66 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 107 Write 62.6 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 64.9 87% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 68%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free, PID 578e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 67 68 67 69 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 160 Write 148 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 66.4 137% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.9 229% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 74%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 362GB free, PID 578e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 64 64 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 76.1 Write 126 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 63.3 111% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.8 202% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 74%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 365GB free, PID 578e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 65 66 66 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 74.1 Write 124 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 64.9 111% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 222% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.2% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 18.1 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.9 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	57.8"	1280 701	PHL0000 Philips FTV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Akoya P5333 H/B548 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Medion Akoya P5333 H/B548

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x

SSD
MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 48%, 1,148 samples	4x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 16GBUnknownBench 60%, 4 samples	2x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	1x
M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 30%, 653 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353