Medion Akoya P5333 H/B548

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion Akoya P5333 H/B548  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 12:48
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 91
2-Core 185
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 358
49% 362 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3203) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 38.9
32% 40.4 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38
Splatting 33.3
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT0101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 30 32 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 419
Write 36.7
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 31.2
31% 144 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 20.9
75% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 40
42% 74 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
367GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 136 138 156 173 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 151
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 148
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 114%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
144GB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 90 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 89.1
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 88.9
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 97%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 82 87 87 88 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 156
Write 166
Mixed 128
SusWrite 86.8
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
394% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 93%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB
833GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 75 81 79 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 119
Write 133
Mixed 112
SusWrite 79.3
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
287% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 93%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB
814GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 76 84 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 107
Write 130
Mixed 121
SusWrite 81.8
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
315% 3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 93%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 37
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 38.7
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Akoya P5333 H/B548 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medion Akoya P5333 H/B548

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback