Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 00:37
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 143
60% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 407
41% 335 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 45 55 53 39 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 495
Write 108
Mixed 174
SusWrite 53.7
45% 208 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 19.2
86% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 27
55% 119 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
34GB free
Firmware: 03.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 93.7
Write 83.4
Mixed 62
SusWrite 72.1
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
932GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 180 180 183 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 178
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 180
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
ST325082 0AS 250GB
140GB free, PID 2338
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.4% Terrible
Read 33.1
Write 29.2
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 0.7
28% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.4%
Great: 19%
WDC WD50 00AAKB-00YSA0 500GB
466GB free, PID 2338
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.9 6.8 6.9 6.6 6.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.42% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 6.8
14% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 2R 0G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 33% 27 68 55 60 0" 1920 1080
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback