Today's hottest deals

Packard ixtreme M5850

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard ixtreme M5850  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard ixtreme M5850
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 10:40
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 392
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Sapphire(174B 2162) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 2.12
2% 2.62 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 363 347 340 348 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 441
Write 416
Mixed 380
SusWrite 354
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 35.7
108% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 348
263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
35GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 50 51 51 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 46.2
Write 38
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 51.3
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 59%
WDC WD75 00BPVT-22HXZT1 750GB
666GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 20 19 20 20 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.59% Terrible
Read 8
Write 7.8
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 18.8
15% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 29%
ST325082 0AS 250GB
161GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 17 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 7
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 16.3
22% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ixtreme M5850 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Packard ixtreme M5850

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback