PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Packard ixtreme M5850 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Packard ixtreme M5850 |
Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101217 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 18 '18 at 10:40 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Sapphire(174B 2162) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
2.24%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 363 347 340 348 332 MB/s
|
89.4%
Excellent
|
|||
28.1%
Poor
|
||||
WDC WD75 00BPVT-22HXZT1 750GB
666GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 20 19 20 20 19 MB/s
|
5.59%
Terrible
|
|||
ST325082 0AS 250GB
161GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 17 17 18 17 MB/s
|
9.79%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 38x |
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 22x |
Core i5-2320Intel $142Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 7x |
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples | 7x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $329 |