Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8469
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 08:41
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 637
65% 527 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 8469) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 36.3
34% 35.9 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 34.7
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 913
Write 1,797
Mixed 989
278% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 74.4
244% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 956
DQ Mixed 1,007
744% 977 MB/s
Poor: 208% Great: 332%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$76
348GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 404 409 417 394 388 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 408
Mixed 389
SusWrite 395
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 38.6
126% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 262
208% 290 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 125%
WDC WD75 00BPVT-22HXZT1 750GB
12GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 48 48 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
Read 89.5
Write 87
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 48.2
93% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FBD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 19.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback